FIGUEROA V. STATE

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT JANUARY TERM, A.D. 2004 LUIS A. FIGUEROA, Appellant, ** ** vs. ** CASE NO. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, ** LOWER TRIBUNAL NO. Appellee. ** 3D04-290 96-16985 Opinion filed March 10, 2004. An Appeal under Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court of Miami-Dade County, David C. Miller, Judge. Luis A. Figueroa, in proper person. Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, for appellee. Before FLETCHER, RAMIREZ, and SHEPHERD, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. The unsigned motion for DNA Evidence Examination does not comply with rule 3.853, Fla. R. Crim. P., but instead attempts to argue ineffective assistance of counsel. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.