ORTIZ V. STATE

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT JULY TERM, 2004 EVER NAHON ORTIZ, Appellant, ** ** vs. ** CASE NO. 3D04-78 THE STATE OF FLORIDA, ** LOWER TRIBUNAL NO. F03-9979 Appellee. ** Opinion filed December 15, 2004. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Richard V. Margolis, Judge. Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Valerie Jonas, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Lucretia A. Pitts, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and LEVY and SHEPHERD, JJ. PER CURIAM. We affirm probation. the Moreover, trial court s contrary to Order revoking Appellant s Defendant s suggestion that probation was not violated where he submitted to TASC evaluation despite the admission that he was discharged from the program for missing two consecutive appointments, we hold that when a court Orders anyone to submit to a program, it is inherent within the Order that the Defendant successfully complete the program. Appellant s remaining points are without merit and/or moot in light of our holding. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.