ZAVALA V. UAC

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT JULY TERM A.D., 2004 ** ANGEL E. ZAVALA, Appellant, ** ** vs. CASE NO. 3D03-3276 ** FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, etc., et al., Appellees. ** ** LOWER TRIBUNAL NO. 03-8838 Opinion filed November 10, 2004. An Appeal from the Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission. Angel E. Zavala, in proper person. John D. Maher (Tallahassee), for appellees. Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and LEVY and WELLS, JJ. PER CURIAM. The decision below denying unemployment compensation benefits is reversed because the conduct complained of did not, as a matter of law, amount to disqualifying misconduct. § 443.036(29), Fla. Stat. (2003); Castillo v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, 785 So. 2d 552 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). remand, the appellant shall be awarded the benefits claimed. After

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.