ADVANCED V. ALLSTATE

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT JULY TERM A.D., 2004 ADVANCED DIAGNOSTICS TESTING A/A/O WILL TURCIOS, ** ** Appellant, vs. ** CASE NO. 3D03-3077 ** ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, ** Appellee. LOWER TRIBUNAL NO. 02-4740 ** Opinion filed October 20, 2004. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Caryn Canner Schwartz, Judge. Robert Cooney; Wasson & Associates, and Roy D. Wasson, and Annabel C. Majewski, for appellant. Shutts & Bowen, LLP, and Frank A. Zacherl, and Douglas G. Brehm, for appellee. McGuire Woods, LLP, and Peter J. Valeta (Illinois) Florida Insurance Council, Inc., as amicus curiae. Before GREEN, FLETCHER, and WELLS, JJ. PER CURIAM. for This is an appeal from a final summary judgment entered in favor of the defendant, Allstate Insurance Company, where the county court certified the following question as one of great public importance: Does the phrase the allowable amount under Medicare Part B as used in Fla. Stat. Section 627.736(5)(b)5 refer only to Medicare s participating fee schedule or does the phrase the allowable amount instead refer to Medicare s limiting charge amount? We accept jurisdiction. In our recent decision of Millennium Diagnostic Imaging Ctr., Inc. v. Sec. Nat l Ins. Co., 29 Fla. L. Weekly D1817 (Fla. 3d DCA Aug. 11, 2004), we found the legislative history and language of the 2003 amendment to section 627.736(5)(b)5, supported our finding that the participating fee schedule was the proper fee schedule under the original statute. The mere fact that the services provided in this case were rendered prior to November 1, 2001, does nothing to change our original conclusion on this matter. Thus, we answer the certified question and hold that the term the allowable amount under Medicare Part B, as used in section 627.736(5)(b)5, refers to the participating physician fee schedule of Medicare Part B, and affirm the final summary judgment. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.