STATE V. HARDWARE
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT JANUARY TERM, A.D. 2004 STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, ** ** ** vs. NARVAL HARDWARE and JUAN FERREIRO, Respondents. ** ** ** CASE NOS. 3D03-2971 3D03-2972 LOWER TRIBUNAL CASE NOS. 02-1068 03-12974 Opinion filed February 11, 2004. A Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Daryl E. Trawick, Judge. Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General and Linda S. Katz, Assistant Attorney General, for petitioner. Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Marti Rothenberg, Assistant Public Defender, for respondents. Before GERSTEN, FLETCHER, and SHEPHERD, JJ. FLETCHER, Judge. The state seeks certiorari review of two trial court orders setting a Frye1 evidentiary hearing to assist the trial court in determining the admissibility into evidence of polygraph ( lie detector ) test results. We quash the two trial court orders. In Davis v. State, 520 So. 2d 572, 573-74 (Fla. 1988) the supreme court stated: The courts of this state have repeatedly held that the factors contributing to the results of a polygraph test - the skill of the operator, the emotional state of the person tested, the fallibility of the machine, and the lack of a specific quantitive relationship between physiological and emotional states are such that the polygraph cannot be recognized as a sufficiently reliable or valid instrument to warrant its use in judicial proceedings unless both sides agree to its use. The Fourth District Court of Appeal was presented in State v. Santiago, 679 So. 2d 861 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) with a trial court ruling that polygraph results favorable to the defendant would be admitted into evidence at trial. The Fourth District Court stated, at 862: We grant the state s petition for certiorari because our supreme court has held that polygraph tests are inadmissible as a matter of law. Although the Fourth District Court certified the question,2 the 1 Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1923). 2 The question certified was: Are the results of polygraph tests inadmissible in evidence as a matter of law? 2 defendant did not attempt to carry the case any further. Similarly to the Fourth District Court, we grant the state s petition for certiorari and quash the orders entered below. also certify the following question: ARE THE RESULTS OF POLYGRAPH TESTS INADMISSIBLE IN EVIDENCE AS A MATTER OF LAW OR ARE POLYGRAPH TESTS SUBJECT TO THE FRYE TEST? 3 We
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
