SEGUROS CONDOR V. COPENHAGEN REINSURANCE

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT JANUARY TERM, A.D., 2004 COMPANIA DE SEGUROS CONDOR, S.A., Appellant, ** ** ** vs. ** CASE NO. 3D03-2655 COPENHAGEN REINSURANCE COMPANY(U.K.)LTD, et al., ** LOWER TRIBUNAL NO. 02-7723 Appellees, ** ** Opinion filed April 14, 2004. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Ronald C. Dresnick, Judge. Horr, Novak & Skipp, P.A., and Patrick E. Novak, and Stephanie H. Wylie, for appellant. Fertig and Gramling, and Darlene M. Lidondici (Fort Lauderdale); Meckler Bulger & Tilson, and Michael S. Loeffler and Charlotte S. Kormendy, for appellees. Before GERSTEN, GODERICH, and FLETCHER, JJ. PER CURIAM. We reverse determining the trial court lacked personal jurisdiction over the case. See Venetian Salami Co. v. Parthenais, 554 So. 2d 499 (Fla. 1989); Ganiko v. Ganiko, 826 So. 2d 391 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); Christus St. Joseph s Health Sys. v. Witt Biomedical Corp., 805 So. 2d 1050 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); Bruzzone Roldos v. Americargo Lines, Inc., 698 So. 2d 1368 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). Reversed and remanded. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.