RIESCO V. UAC

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT JULY TERM A.D., 2004 MARTA RIESCO, ** Appellant, ** vs. ** FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION and ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES, LTD., Appellees. CASE NO. 3D03-2113 ** ** ** LOWER TRIBUNAL CASE NO. 03-6417 Opinion filed November 24, 2004. An appeal from the Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission. Teri Guttman Valdes, for appellant. John D. Maher (Tallahassee), for appellee Florida UAC. Before GREEN, FLETCHER, and RAMIREZ, JJ. PER CURIAM. The decision below denying unemployment compensation benefits is reversed because the conduct complained of did not, as a matter law, amount to disqualifying misconduct. § 443.036(29), Fla. Stat. (2003); Castillo v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm n, 785 So. 2d 552 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). remand, the appellant shall be awarded the benefits claimed. After

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.