PRATER V. MORTGAGE
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT JANUARY TERM, A.D. 2004 LINDA M. PRATER, Appellant, vs. ** ** ** MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. Appellee. ** CASE NO. 3D03-1727 LOWER TRIBUNAL NO. 02-23487 ** ** Opinion filed February 25, 2004. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Margarita Esquiroz, Judge. Linda M. Prater, in proper person. Shapiro & Fishman and Susan Minor, for appellee. Before LEVY, GERSTEN, and SHEPHERD, JJ. PER CURIAM. Appellant Linda M. Prater brings this appeal from an Order Ratifying Clerk s Sale and Directing Issuance of Certificate of Title and Denying Defendant s Objection to Sale. Although we are not unsympathetic to appellant s rendering of her factual plight, we nevertheless affirm. In order to vacate a foreclosure sale, the trial court must find (1) that the foreclosure sale bid was grossly or startlingly inadequate; and (2) that the inadequacy of the bid resulted from some mistake, fraud, or other irregularity in the sale. Mody v. California Fed. Bank, 747 So. 2d 1016, 1017-18 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (citing Arlt v. Buchanan, 190 So. 2d 575, 577 (Fla. 1966)). In this case, appellant is unable to meet these legal requirements. affirmed. Accordingly, the order under review is hereby
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
