MILLER V. STATE

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT JANUARY TERM, A.D. 2004 TRACEY MILLER, ** Appellant, vs. ** ** THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ** ** CASE NO. 3D03-1230 LOWER TRIBUNAL NO. 98-40881 and 98-41157 Opinion filed February 25, 2004. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jose M. Rodriguez, Judge. Frank A. Abrams, for appellant. Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Thomas C. Mielke, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and WELLS and SHEPHERD, JJ. PER CURIAM. We have for review the denial by the trial court of Appellant s Rule 3.850 Motion for Post Conviction Relief based on ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court denied Miller s motion after an evidentiary hearing at which Appellant was afforded a full and fair opportunity to present evidence on his behalf and cross-examine his trial counsel. trial court to deny substantial evidence. 1997). Affirmed. the We find that the decision of the motion was supported by competent Blanco v. State, 702 So. 2d 1250 (Fla.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.