BUSCHOR V. UAC

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT JANUARY TERM, A.D. 2004 DEBORAH A. BUSCHOR, ** Appellant, ** vs. ** IDC REALTY SERVICES, INC., and FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, Appellees. CASE NO. 3D03-1214 ** ** ** LOWER TRIBUNAL NO. 03-3927 Opinion filed April 28, 2004. An appeal from the Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission. Deborah A. Buschor, in proper person. John D. Maher (Tallahassee), for appellee Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission. Before COPE, LEVY and GREEN, JJ. PER CURIAM. Deborah A. Buschor compensation benefits. appeals the denial of unemployment In the present case conflicting testimony was offered by the parties. It was the responsibility of the referee to resolve the conflicts, which he did in this case in favor of the employer. See Wallace v. Zahn Dental Co., Inc., 618 So. 2d 382 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). This court is not allowed to overturn the referee's factual findings, as long as there was competent, substantial evidence at the hearing which supports the findings. See Gonzalez v. Master Flowers, Inc., 605 So. 2d 180 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). As we see no legal basis on which to disturb the referee's findings, the order is affirmed. See also St. Augustine Church v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm n, 754 So. 2d 183 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Stahl v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm n, 502 So. 2d 78 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). Affirmed. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.