FERRARI V. LOWENSTEIN

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT JANUARY TERM, A.D. 2004 CARMEN FERRARI, Appellant, ** ** CASE NO. 3D03-1131 vs. ** LOWENSTEIN & COMPANY, P.A., and FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, ** LOWER TRIBUNAL NO. 03-3011 Appellees. ** ** Opinion filed January 28, 2004. An Appeal from the Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission. Carmen Ferrari, in proper person. John D. Maher (Tallahassee), for appellee, Unemployment Appeals Commission. Before GERSTEN, RAMIREZ, and WELLS, JJ. PER CURIAM. We affirm the denial of unemployment benefits based on the Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission s finding of misconduct connected with work, see § 443.036(29), Fla. Stat. (2002), as we must accept the findings of fact made by the appeals referee where the findings are supported by competent substantial evidence in the record. See St. Augustine Church v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm n, 754 So. 2d 183 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Fink v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm n, 665 So. 2d 373 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.