E.I. DUPONT V. SUPER HELECHOS

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT JANUARY TERM, A.D. 2004 E. I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS & CO., ** INC., etc., et al., ** Appellants, ** vs. ** SUPER HELECHOS, S.A., etc., et al., ** Appellees. CASE NOS. 3D02-1640, 3D02-1642, 3D02-1648, 3D03-1815, 3D03-1830, 3D03-1832 LOWER TRIBUNAL CASE NOS. 01-6932, 01-6935, 01-23796 ** Opinion filed June 9, 2004. An appeal of a non-final order from the Circuit Court of Miami-Dade County, Amy Steele Donner, Judge. Shook, Hardy & Bacon and Kathleen M. O Connor and Sergio E. Pagliery and Daniel B. Rogers and Thomas M. Sherouse and Todd L. Wallen and Briana M. Lundy and Jane Kreusler-Walsh (West Palm Beach), for appellants. Holland & Hart and Craig M. J. Allely; Elizabeth K. Russo, for appellees. Before COPE, GODERICH, and FLETCHER, JJ. PER CURIAM. E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Company, Inc. and Leon J. DeLeon seek reversal of the trial court s order denying their Motions to Dismiss on the Ground of Forum Non Conveniens. Finding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion, we affirm the order. Aerolineas Argentinas, S.A. v. Gimenez, 807 So. 2d 111 (Fla. 3d DCA)(decision to grant or deny a forum non conveniens motion for dismissal rests in the sound discretion of the trial court), rev. denied, 828 So. 2d 386 (Fla. 2002). Affirmed. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.