RODRIGUEZ V. STATE

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT JULY TERM A.D., 2004 ** LUIS O. RODRIGUEZ, ** Appellant, ** vs. CASE NO. 3D01-2017 ** THE STATE OF FLORIDA, ** LOWER TRIBUNAL NO. 93-25817 Appellee. ** Opinion filed November 10, 2004. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Leslie Rothenberg, Judge. Mark Graham Hanson, for appellant. Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Traina, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Before Judge. COPE and GODERICH, JJ., and NESBITT, and Jill JOSEPH, K. Senior PER CURIAM. Affirmed. (Fla. 3d DCA See Henderson v. State, 626 So. 2d 310, 311 1993) ( Relief is not warranted where counsel merely fails to inform a client about the various ramifications of gain time as opposed to volunteering incorrect information. ); Simmons v. State, 611 So. 2d 1250, 1252 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992) ( Neither the trial court nor counsel is required to forewarn a defendant about every conceivable collateral consequence of a plea to criminal charges. ); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.172(c). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.