SANCHEZ V. STATE

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT JANUARY TERM, A.D. 2003 ROBERTO SANCHEZ, Appellant, ** ** vs. ** CASE NO. 3D03-1153 THE STATE OF FLORIDA, ** LOWER TRIBUNAL NO. 00-19211 Appellee. ** Opinion filed June 4, 2003. An Appeal under Fla.R.App.P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Dennis J. Murphy, Judge. Roberto Sanchez, in proper person. Charles J. Crist, Attorney General, for appellee. Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GREEN and RAMIREZ, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed on the authority of State v. Franklin, 836 So. 2d 1112 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). Conflict is certified with Taylor v. State, 818 So. 2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), rev. dismissed, 821 So. 2d 302 (Fla. 2002). SCHWARTZ, C.J., and RAMIREZ, J., concur. Sanchez v. State Case No. 3D03-1153 GREEN, J. (specially concurring). The doctrine of stare decisis compels me to join in the reversal of this cause, but I continue to adhere to the view that Taylor v. State, 818 So. 2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), review dismissed, 821 So. 2d 302 (Fla. 2002), was correct in its conclusion that Chapter Law 99-188, Laws of Florida, violates the single subject rule of the Florida Constitution, accord Carlson v. State, 27 Fla. L. Weekly D1701 (Fla. 5th DCA July 26, 2002).

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.