PRITCHETT V. CITY OF HOMESTEAD
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT JULY TERM, A.D. 2003 THOMAS PRITCHETT, Appellant, vs. ** ** ** CITY OF HOMESTEAD, etc. Appellee. ** CASE NO. 3D02-2366 LOWER TRIBUNAL NO. 00-14999 ** Opinion filed October 1, 2003. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Florida, Alan L. Postman, Judge. Anthony J. Soto and Robert Rubenstein, for appellant. Weiss Serota Helfman Pastoriza Guesdes Cole & Boniske and Christopher F. Kurtz and Joseph H. Serota, for appellee. Before COPE and GERSTEN, JJ., and NESBITT, Senior Judge. PER CURIAM. The appellant, a City of Homestead policeman, was investigated by the City s police department internal affairs investigators for possible wrong doing in connection with his documentation of narcotics investigations. The City ultimately forwarded the matter to the State Attorney s Office which analyzed whether discrepancies in appellant s reports constituted official misconduct or perjury under Florida activities law. the The State investigators Attorney found concluded should be that the handled administratively, and returned the file to the City. Appellant was given a written reprimand by the City s police department. He subsequently sued the City for negligent supervision of the investigation and alleged that he suffered from loss of earnings due to the denial of an anticipated promotion. The trial court granted summary final judgment in favor of the City and we affirm. Beginning with Trianon Park Condominium Ass n v. City of Hialeah, 468 So. 2d 912 (Fla. 1985) and Everton v. Willard, 468 So. 2d 936 (Fla. 1985) it has been recognized that the negligent conduct of police investigations does not give rise to a cause of action because the duty to protect citizens and enforce the law is one owed generally to the public. See also Seguine v. City of Miami, 627 So. 2d 14 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993) (police decisions as to enforcement of criminal law are generally immune from tort liability under discretionary function exception to waiver of sovereign tort immunity); State v. Kowalski, 617 So. 2d 1099 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993) review denied 626 So. 2d 1367 (Fla. 1993)(duty to enforce laws and protect public safety does not create legal duty of care to person who is subject of criminal investigation, approved by this Court in Stephen v. State, 659 So. 2d 705 (Fla. 3d 2 DCA 1995)); J.B. v. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 591 So. 2d 317 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) (law enforcement officer s alleged negligent failure to proceed investigation does not give rise to a cause of action). Affirmed. 3 with an
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
