TORRES V. STATE

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT JANUARY TERM, A.D. 2003 HECTOR R. TORRES, Appellant, vs. ** ** ** THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. CASE NO. 3D02-1217 ** LOWER TRIBUNAL NO. 00-41068 ** Opinion filed June 11, 2003. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Victoria S. Sigler, Judge. Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. and Valerie Jonas, Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Jill K. Traina, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Before COPE, GODERICH and GREEN, JJ. PER CURIAM. Hector R. Torres appeals his convictions for aggravated assault on a law enforcement officer and possession of marijuana. We affirm. At trial, a police officer testified over defense objection that a witness had said defendant-appellant is always armed with a .25 [pistol]. The hearsay objection was well taken. It was not a spontaneous statement describing or explaining an event or condition made while the declarant was perceiving the event or condition . . . . § 90.803(1), Fla. Stat. (2002). See Charles W. Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence § 803.1 (2002). Thus, the hearsay exception for spontaneous statements did not apply. Likewise, the declarant s statement was not one which related to a startling event or condition made while the declarant was under the stress of excitement caused by the event or condition. § 90.803(2), Fla. Stat. (2002). The officer s testimony negated the existence of any stress of excitement on the part of the declarant. Thus, the hearsay exception for excited utterances did not apply. See Charles W. Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence § 803.2. Under the circumstances of this case, however, the evidentiary error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. 491 So. 2d 1129 (Fla. 1986). Affirmed. 2 State v. DiGuilio,

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.