TRAVEL GUARD GROUP V. GRUBB
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT JULY TERM, A.D. 2001 TRAVEL GUARD GROUP, INC., Appellant, ** ** vs. ** CASE NO. 3D01-686 VINCENT GRUBB, ** LOWER TRIBUNAL NO. 00-3917 Appellee. ** Opinion filed September 5, 2001. An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Celeste Hardee Muir, Judge. Quarles & Brady and Edmond E. Koester (Naples); Jeffrey O. Davis and Sean M. Scullen (Milwaukee), for appellant. Greenspoon, Marder, Hirschfeld, Rafkin, Ross & Berger and Richard E. Epstein and Haas A. Hatic and Kenneth B. Schwartz (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee. Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and SORONDO and RAMIREZ, JJ. PER CURIAM. We find no abuse of the trial court s discretion in denying temporary injunctive relief for the enforcement of the terms of a non-competitive agreement. See Uro-Care, P.A. v. Montford, M.D., 775 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Bradley v. Health Coalition, Inc., 687 So. 2d 329 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Lurton v. Muldon Motor Co., 523 So. 2d 706 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); see also Kupscznk v. Blasters, Inc., 647 So. 2d 888, 891 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994), review denied, 658 So. 2d 991 (Fla. 1995); Cordis Corp. v. Prooslin, 482 So. 2d 486 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). Affirmed. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
