DAVIS V. STATE

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT JULY TERM, A.D. 2001 CHAZ DAVIS, Appellant, ** ** vs. ** CASE NO. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, ** LOWER TRIBUNAL NOS. 83-27791, 83-38745, 86-16376A, 89-35513, 90-22514, 90-28650, 92-5041, 92-6420, 92-17563A, 93-16949, 93-19167 ** Appellee. ** 3D01-3095 ** Opinion filed December 26, 2001. An Appeal under Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court of Miami-Dade County, Victoria S. Sigler, Judge. Chaz Davis, in proper person. Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee. Before COPE, FLETCHER, and RAMIREZ, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Major v. State, 790 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). We also certify the same question as in Major: WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAS A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE? 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.