REINBERG V. REINBERG

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT JULY TERM, A.D. 2001 MARILYN REINBERG, Appellant, ** ** vs. ** CASE NO. 3D01-2512 MARVIN E. REINBERG, M.D., ** LOWER TRIBUNAL NO. 88-15283 Appellee. ** Opinion filed December 5, 2001. An appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Rosa I. Rodriguez, Judge. Metsch & Metsch, P.A. and Lawrence R. Metsch, for appellant. Elkins & Freedman and Richard L. Freedman (Ft. Lauderdale), for appellee. Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GREEN and SHEVIN, JJ. PER CURIAM. The former wife appeals a non-final order denying her motion for her former husband to post a bond to secure his obligation to make future alimony payments. Although the former wife established a need for the security, there was competent substantial evidence presented that the former husband did not have the present ability to provide the same. 2d DCA 2001). See Dziuba v. Dziuba, 784 So. 2d 1192 (Fla. Accordingly, on the record before us, we cannot conclude that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the former wife s motion. Affirmed. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.