PAPA V. STATE

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT JULY TERM, A.D. 2001 ANTHONY D. PAPA, JR., Appellant, ** ** vs. ** THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. Opinion filed CASE NO. 3D01-233 ** LOWER TRIBUNAL NOS. 00-27092 00-30372 ** September 5, 2001. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jeffrey Rosinek, Judge. Anthony Papa, Jr. in proper person. Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Charles M. Fahlbusch, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Before GREEN, FLETCHER, and SORONDO, JJ. PER CURIAM., Affirmed. See Fla. Admin. Code Ann. r. 33-103.007 (2000); § 95.11(8), Fla. Stat.(2000); Fla. R. App. Proc. 9.100(c); Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 563-66 (1974)(procedural due process minimum requirements are satisfied where there is written notice of the claimed violation, a written statement of the evidence relied upon and the reasons for the disciplinary action taken, and an opportunity to call witnesses and present documentary evidence in defense).

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.