D.L.F. V. STATE

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT JULY TERM, A.D. 2001 D.L.F., a juvenile, Appellant, vs. ** ** ** THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. CASE NO. 3D01-23 ** LOWER TRIBUNAL NO. 00-6097 ** Opinion filed September 19, 2001. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Scott Bernstein, Judge. Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Andrew Stanton, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Michael Neimand (Ft. Lauderdale), Assistant Attorney General, and Marni A. Bryson, Legal Intern, for appellee. Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and LEVY and SHEVIN, JJ. PER CURIAM. We affirm the evidentiary ruling challenged on appeal. "It is axiomatic that failure to proffer what the excluded evidence would have revealed precludes appellate consideration of the alleged error." A. McD. v. State, 422 So. 2d 336, 337 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Mosley v. State, 616 So. 2d 1129 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). However, on remand, the trial court shall conform the written community control order to reflect the oral pronouncement withholding adjudication. Affirmed; remanded with instructions. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.