MARRERO V. STATE

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT JULY TERM, 2001 FERNANDO MARRERO, Appellant, vs. ** ** ** THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. CASE NO. 3D01-2137 ** LOWER TRIBUNAL NO. 91-1881 ** Opinion filed October 31, 2001. An Appeal under Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Maria E. Dennis, Judge. Fernando Marrero, in proper person. Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee. Before JORGENSON, GODERICH, and SORONDO, JJ. ON MOTION TO PASS UPON A QUESTION CERTIFIED TO BE OF GREAT PUBLIC IMPORTANCE PER CURIAM. We grant the motion. As in Major v. State, 790 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001), we certify that we have passed on the following question of great public importance: WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE? Motion granted; question certified. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.