ROBERT ARNAZ RACKARD VS NATION STAR MORTGAGE, LLC D/B/A MR. COOPER AND JOHNATHAN

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 6D23-2716 Lower Tribunal No. 2022-CA-002636-O _____________________________ ROBERT ARNAZ RACKARD, Appellant, v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC d/b/a MR. COOPER and JOHNATHAN MEISELS, Appellees. _____________________________ Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County. Vincent Falcone, III, Judge. May 3, 2024 PER CURIAM. Due to Appellant Robert Arnaz Rackard’s apparent abuse of the legal process by his repetitive and frivolous pro se filings contesting the foreclosure judgment entered against him in Orange County Circuit Court Case No. 2022-CA-002636-O, this Court issued an order directing Appellant to show cause why he should not be prohibited from future pro se filings. See State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47, 48 (Fla. 1999). Appellant filed a response, which we have reviewed. Finding Appellant has failed to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed, we conclude that Appellant is abusing the judicial process and should be barred from further pro se filings. To conserve judicial resources, Appellant is prohibited from filing with this Court any further pro se filings concerning Orange County Circuit Court Case No. 2022-CA-002636-O. The Clerk of this Court is directed not to accept any further pro se filings concerning the referenced case. The Clerk will summarily reject any future filings regarding the referenced case unless filed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar. FUTURE PRO SE FILINGS PROHIBITED. TRAVER, C.J., and WOZNIAK and BROWNLEE, JJ., concur. Robert Arnaz Rackard, Orlando, pro se. Dorrella L. Gallaway, of Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders, LLP, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee, Nationstar Mortgage, LLC d/b/a Mr. Cooper. No Appearance for Appellee, Johnathan Meisels. NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.