ROCKY BUNNELL vs STATE OF FLORIDA

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT ROCKY T. BUNNELL, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2D18-3793 Opinion filed March 11, 2020. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Mark R. Wolfe, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Tosha Cohen, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Rocky Bunnell appeals four judgments and sentences entered pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement. We affirm his judgments and sentences. However, "[b]ecause the trial court made an oral determination that" Mr. Bunnell "was competent but failed to render a written order to that effect we must remand the case to the trial court for entry of a nunc pro tunc order finding" Mr. Bunnell "competent to stand trial." See Holland v. State, 185 So. 3d 636, 637 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016); see also Hampton v. State, 988 So. 2d 103, 106 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008); Corbitt v. State, 744 So. 2d 1130, 1130 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). Affirmed; remanded with directions. SILBERMAN, MORRIS, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur. -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.