THANH-THUY THI LE vs DEUTSCHE BANK NATION TRUST CO., AS TRUSTEE
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT THANH-THUY THI LE, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) ) DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST ) COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR MORGAN ) STANLEY ABS CAPITAL 1 INC. TRUST ) 2006-WMC2 MORTGAGE PASS) THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES ) 2006-WMC2, ) ) Appellee. ) Case No. 2D17-2959 ) Opinion filed October 26, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Perry A. Little, Senior Judge. Thanh-Thuy Thi Le, pro se. Melissa A. Giasi and Richard S. McIver of Kass Shuler, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Thanh-Thuy Thi Le, pro se, challenges (1) the trial court's order denying her motion for relief from a 2014 foreclosure judgment entered in favor of Deutsche Bank National Trust Company in August 2014, (2) the trial court's order denying rehearing of its denial of the motion for relief from judgment, and (3) the trial court's order granting the bank's motion to reset the foreclosure sale. We affirm the denials of the motion to vacate and the motion for rehearing without further comment. And we dismiss the portion of this appeal that attempts to challenge the order resetting the foreclosure sale as it is not an appealable order. See Pridgen v. First Union Bank, 879 So. 2d 21, 21 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) ("An order that merely schedules a foreclosure sale is not a final appealable order. Rather, it is a purely administrative, interlocutory step in the judicial sales process."). Affirmed in part; dismissed in part. MORRIS, SLEET, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
