Huff v. State

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT JOHN CECIL HUFF, DOC #498690 Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2D15-1630 Opinion filed December 14, 2016. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Steven Scott Stephens, Judge. John Huff, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Gillian N. Leytham, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. We affirm the postconviction court's denial of Huff's motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. In Issue VI of his pro se brief on appeal, however, Huff appears to argue that, upon revocation of his probation in case no. 12-CF-004128, the trial court imposed an illegal sentence on count one because of a scoresheet error. Huff did not preserve this issue for review. Accordingly, our affirmance is without prejudice to Huff's right to file a legally sufficient motion for relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Affirmed. CASANUEVA, SLEET, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur. -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.