Stanley v. Great Glam, Inc.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT BRITTANIE STANLEY, Appellant, v. GREAT GLAM, INC.; GREAT GLAM STORE 1 INC.; and GREAT GLAM STORE 2 INC., Appellees. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2D13-2647 Opinion filed June 11, 2014. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Christopher C. Sabella, Judge. Ronald W. Fraley of The Fraley Firm, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant. Christina C. Hebert, Tampa, for Appellees. PER CURIAM. Brittanie Stanley appeals a final judgment that was entered based on the trial court's earlier decision to dismiss a claim of pregnancy discrimination under the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, which is codified at sections 760.01 through 760.11 and section 509.092 of the Florida Statutes. The limited issue of law in this case turns on whether section 760.10(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2012), prohibits discrimination on the basis of pregnancy by an employer in Florida. In a recent decision, the Florida Supreme Court interpreted section 760.10(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2011), as prohibiting discrimination by an employer on the basis of pregnancy. See Delva v. Cont'l Grp., Inc., 39 Fla. L. Weekly S246 (Fla. Apr. 17, 2014). Accordingly, we reverse the final judgment and remand for further proceedings. Reversed and remanded. ALTENBERND, SILBERMAN, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur. -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.