Islander Building Co. v. Klaus
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT ISLANDER BUILDING COMPANY, Appellant, v. BRUNO KLAUS and CHERYL KLAUS, Appellees. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2D10-4513 Opinion filed October 21, 2011. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Charlotte County; James R. Shenko, Judge. Terrence L. Lavy of Vernis & Bowling of Southwest Florida, P.A., Fort Myers, for Appellant. Glenn N. Siegel of Glenn N. Siegel, P.A., Port Charlotte, for Appellees. WALLACE, Judge. Islander Building Company appeals a final judgment awarding damages against it and in favor of Bruno and Cheryl Klaus on their claim for breach of a construction contract against Islander. Islander argues under issue one on appeal that the circuit court erred in determining that the Klauses were entitled to their attorney's fees under a fee provision in the construction contract. But in the final judgment, the circuit court reserved jurisdiction to determine the reasonable amount of the Klauses' attorney's fees and did not establish the amount of the fees to be awarded. Thus the final judgment is not a final appealable order on the issue of attorney's fees, and this court lacks jurisdiction to address Islander's arguments under issue one. See Ulrich v. Eaton Vance Distribs., Inc., 764 So. 2d 731, 733 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) ("[N]otwithstanding the finality of the judgment as it relates to the underlying dispute, the attorney's fee issue is not finally resolved or ripe for appellate review until both entitlement and amount have been determined."). Under issue two, Islander argues that the circuit court abused its discretion in admitting the testimony of the Klauses' expert in accounting and construction on various matters at trial. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that Islander's arguments under issue two are without merit and do not warrant further discussion. Accordingly, we dismiss Islander's appeal from the final judgment to the extent Islander challenges the circuit court's determination of the Klauses' entitlement to attorney's fees under the construction contract. Islander may again raise its entitlement arguments on appeal from a final order awarding the Klauses their attorney's fees. We affirm the final judgment in all other respects. Dismissed in part and affirmed in part. WHATLEY and NORTHCUTT, JJ., Concur. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
