Taylor v. State

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT SHELDON K. TAYLOR, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) ________________________________ ) Case No. 2D06-2461 Opinion filed October 20, 2006. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Debra K. Behnke, Judge. PER CURIAM. Sheldon K. Taylor challenges the denial of his motion for jail credit filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm the postconviction court's order because Taylor's motion is facially insufficient. See Gilbert v. State, 805 So. 2d 70 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Colosimo v. State, 775 So. 2d 352 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). However, our affirmance is without prejudice to Taylor's right to file a facially sufficient rule 3.800(a) motion. Affirmed. CASANUEVA, STRINGER, and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.