Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Profis
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, Petitioner, v. NICOLE PROFIS, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2D01-1261 Opinion filed March 22, 2002. Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit for Hillsborough County; sitting in its appellate capacity. Enoch J. Whitney, General Counsel, and Rhonda M. Diamond, Assistant General Counsel, Miami, for Petitioner. Eilam Isaak, Tampa, for Respondent. STRINGER, Judge. In this appeal, the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles (DHSMV) seeks certiorari review of a circuit court order granting Nicole Profis s petition for writ of certiorari and quashing an order of the DHSMV. The DHSMV suspended Profis s driver's license based on her arrest for driving under the influence of alcohol and breath test results which showed that her blood alcohol level exceeded the legal limit at the time of her arrest. The circuit court quashed the order of the DHSMV because it concluded that the DHSMV failed to prove that the breath test administered to Profis was performed in substantial compliance with the applicable administrative rules. In accordance with the nearly identical cases of Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Sexton, 27 Fla. L. Weekly D314 (Fla. 2d DCA Feb. 1, 2002), and Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Alliston, No. 2D01-852 (Fla. 2d DCA Mar. 13, 2002), we conclude that the circuit court departed from the essential requirements of law in determining that the DHSMV failed to present substantial, competent evidence that the breath test was performed in substantial compliance with the applicable administrative rules. Additionally, for the reasons stated in Alliston, we conclude that the circuit court's error resulted in a miscarriage of justice requiring certiorari relief. See Alliston, No. 2D01-852, slip op. at 7. Therefore, we quash the order granting Profis s petition for writ of certiorari and remand for further proceedings. FULMER and WHATLEY, JJ., Concur. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
