Dorsey v. State
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT CHARLES LEON DORSEY, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2D01-1683 Opinion filed September 21, 2001. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Jack Espinosa, Jr., Judge. GREEN, Judge. Charles Leon Dorsey appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). In his motion, Dorsey alleged that he was entitled to relief pursuant to Hale v. State, 630 So. 2d 521 (Fla. 1993). We affirm the trial court's order without prejudice to any right Dorsey might have to file a facially sufficient motion to correct illegal sentence alleging that the determination of whether his offenses were part of the same criminal episode could be made "without resort to extra-record facts." Adams v. State, 755 So. 2d 678, 680 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). We affirm the denial of Dorsey's remaining claims without comment. Affirmed. THREADGILL, A.C.J., and STRINGER, J., Concur.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
