J.H., THE MOTHER vs DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT J.H., the mother, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee. No. 4D19-2507 [February 5, 2020] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Yael Gamm, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2017-2754-CJ-DP. Roger Ally of Law Offices of Roger Ally, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carolyn Schwarz, Assistant Attorney General, Children’s Legal Services, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee. Thomasina F. Moore, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Laura J. Lee, Senior Attorney, Appellate Division, Statewide Guardian Ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, for Guardian Ad Litem. PER CURIAM. The final order on appeal granted two fathers’ motions to terminate protective supervision, denied the Department’s motion to adjudicate the children dependent, terminated protective supervision, and terminated jurisdiction. Nonetheless, the order required the mother to complete additional case plan tasks. We agree with the Department’s concession that this case is controlled by N.A. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 267 So. 3d 430, 434 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019), because the court “lacked statutory authority to both terminate jurisdiction and order the mother to complete a case plan.” We reverse that portion of the order involving the mother and a case plan and remand to the circuit court to enter a new order, based on the evidence in the record, that is consistent with the best interest of the children. GROSS, DAMOORGIAN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur. * * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
