KORY SOLTIS vs STATE OF FLORIDA
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT KORY SOLTIS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D18-598 [May 1, 2019] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Geoffrey D. Cohen, Judge; L.T. Case No. 16004297CF10A. Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Erika Follmer, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant. Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Joseph D. Coronato, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee. DAMOORGIAN, J. Kory Soltis appeals his judgment of guilt and sentence for one count of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, one count of resisting arrest with violence, one count of felony battery, and one count of culpable negligence. Appellant contends that the trial court erred by failing to make a proper Nelson 1 inquiry after he filed a motion to dismiss his courtappointed counsel. We affirm because Appellant failed to preserve the issue for appellate review. Appellant’s convictions were the result of a no contest plea. Several months prior to the date the court considered Appellant’s plea, Appellant filed a pro se motion to dismiss his court-appointed counsel. However, Appellant took no steps to bring his motion to the court’s attention despite having the opportunity to do so. Then, at his change of plea hearing, Appellant expressed his satisfaction with the same court-appointed counsel. Under these circumstances, Appellant waived his right to have 1 Nelson v. State, 274 So. 2d 256 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973). the trial court conduct a Nelson inquiry. See Hall v. State, 92 So. 3d 223, 225–26 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (holding that by failing to bring his pro se motion to dismiss counsel to the court’s attention and proceeding to trial with the same court-appointed counsel without voicing any objection, the defendant failed to preserve the court’s error in failing to conduct a Nelson inquiry); Sheffield v. State, 769 So. 2d 493, 493 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (same); Kinzie v. State, 696 So. 2d 530, 530–31 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (same). Affirmed. CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur. * * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
