MICKAEL JACKSON vs STATE OF FLORIDA
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT MICKAEL JACKSON a/k/a MICHAEL JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D14-4918 [June 21, 2017] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Barbara McCarthy, Judge; L.T. Case No. 12-11052 CF10A. Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Peggy Natale, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Matthew Steven Ocksrider, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee. ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA PER CURIAM. In our original decision, this court affirmed appellant’s consecutive sentences imposed under section 775.087(2)(d), commonly known as the 10-20-Life statute, for armed carjacking and robbery with a firearm, which occurred on the same date and involved the same victim. On review of a certified question concerning whether section 775.087(2)(d) requires consecutive sentences when the sentences arise from one criminal episode, the supreme court quashed our decision and remanded for reconsideration in light of Walton v. State, 208 So. 3d 60 (Fla. 2016), and Williams v. State, 186 So. 3d 989 (Fla. 2016), which were decided after the issuance of our opinion. Consistent with those decisions, we reverse appellant’s consecutive sentences and remand for resentencing consistent with the supreme court’s decision. Reversed and remanded for resentencing. CIKLIN, C.J., TAYLOR and LEVINE, JJ., concur. * * 2 *
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
