Lee Anthony Recio v. State

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT July Term 2012 LEE ANTHONY RECIO, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D11-3980 [September 5, 2012] PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Appellant is cautioned against future motions, petitions or appeals raising the same challenges to his sentence in this case. Such attempts will result in referral to the appropriate institution for consideration of disciplinary procedures which may include forfeiture of gain time, see § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat., and issuance of an order to show cause why further sanctions barring pro se filings should not be imposed as well under State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47, 48 49 (Fla. 1999). MAY, C.J., GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur. * * * Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Paul L. Backman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 00-2892 CF10A. Lee Anthony Recio, Lake Butler, pro se. No appearance required for appellee. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.