Randy Deonarinesingh v. State

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT July Term 2012 RANDY DEONARINESINGH, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D11-3967 [September 27, 2012] PER CURIAM. We affirm the order summarily denying appellant s petition and amended petition for writ of error coram nobis which attempted to challenge his 1997 plea. The circuit court properly treated the petition as a motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, which has supplanted the need for the writ of error coram nobis. Wood v. State, 750 So. 2d 592, 594-95 (Fla. 1999). Appellant s motion was untimely pursuant to rule 3.850(b). Appellant s claim that the trial court failed to advise him of deportation consequences was not brought within the two-year window created by State v. Green, 944 So. 2d 208 (Fla. 2006). Appellant h a s not demonstrated, as Green requires, how he can conclusively show that the warning was not given. Id. at 218. Appellant has not provided a transcript of the plea colloquy, and the state notes that appellant signed and initialed a plea form which advised of the possibility of deportation. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.172(c)(8). Padilla v. Kentucky, 130 S.Ct. 1473 (2010), is not retroactive. Hernandez v. State, 61 So. 3d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011), rev. granted, 81 So. 3d 414 (Fla. 2012); Arellano v. State, 90 So. 3d 923, 923-24 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). Further, appellant concedes that h e has two federal convictions which may subject him to deportation. Thus, he has not shown that the plea in this case was the sole basis for his deportation. Buton v. State, 995 So. 2d 1130, 1132 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). Affirmed. POLEN, TAYLOR and GERBER, JJ., concur. * * * Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Carlos S. Rebollo, Judge; L.T. Case No. 96-10332CF10A. Randy Deonarinesingh, Big Spring, Texas, pro se. No appearance required for appellee. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.