Steve B. Clark v. State
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2012 STEVE B. CLARK, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. No. 4D11-2186 [June 20, 2012] PER CURIAM. The defendant s petition alleges ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. The petition raises four grounds. We grant the petition as to only the first ground. The first ground argues that appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to raise the issue of whether the defendant s convictions for first degree grand theft and making a false insurance claim greater than $100,000, both allegedly stemming from the same action, violate double jeopardy. See Kist v. State, 900 So. 2d 571, 571-72 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (granting petition alleging appellate counsel was ineffective in failing to raise a claim that the defendant s convictions for both grand theft and insurance fraud stemming from the same action violated double jeopardy); LaRoche v. State, 761 So. 2d 335, 336-37 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (on direct appeal, holding convictions violated double jeopardy because the same action constituted the basis for the defendant s grand theft a n d insurance fraud convictions; vacating insurance fraud conviction). Accordingly, the circuit court, within thirty days from the issuance of our mandate in this case, shall appoint appellate counsel to represent the defendant on the above issue on appeal. Appellate counsel, within thirty days of the appointment, shall file a new notice of appeal and reference this opinion in the notice of appeal. We deny the petition as to the second and third grounds, both of which we conclude lack merit. We previously dismissed the fourth ground of the petition as untimely. Petition granted in part, denied in part. HAZOURI, GERBER and LEVINE, JJ., concur. * * * Petition alleging ineffective assistance of counsel to the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Robert R. Makemson, Judge; L.T. Case No. 05-1190 CF10B. Steve B. Clark, Crawfordville, pro se. Pamela J o Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, a n d Joseph A. Tringali, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for respondent. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
