Hall v. State

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2011 ANTONIO HALL, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D09-3909 [February 2, 2011] PER CURIAM. Antonio Hall appeals the summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion. We reverse in part. Hall entered a plea in August 2007. Within two months he moved to vacate the plea. One of his claims concerns counsel s representation that if Hall pleaded, his record would be sealed or expunged. Hall alleges that after he entered into the plea he received a letter from counsel advising that due to the nature of the charges he was not eligible to have his record sealed. Hall alleges if properly advised, h e would have proceeded to trial. We reverse and remand for further review of this claim. See Marshall v. State, 983 So. 2d 680 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). In doing so, we note that this is not a case involving the use of the conviction to enhance a sentence, nor is it a situation where the movant waited for any adverse consequence associated with counsel s alleged advice. See State v. Dickey, 928 So. 2d 1193 (Fla. 2006); Phillips v. State, 960 So. 2d 29 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). Accordingly, the trial court s order summarily denying the defendant s claim for post-conviction relief is reversed as to this point, and the case is remanded for an evidentiary hearing thereon. We affirm the trial court s summary denial of the other ground raised in defendant s motion. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded. TAYLOR, CIKLIN and GERBER, JJ., concur. * * * Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Geoffrey D. Cohen, Judge; L.T. Case No. 07-5105CF10A. Kayo E. Morgan, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant. Pamela J o Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, a n d Diane F. Medley, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.