Robinson v. State

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT July Term 2010 CLAY ROBINSON, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D09-3991 [ July 14, 2010 ] PER CURIAM. We affirm the trial court s order denying appellant s Rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief as untimely. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(b). Although appellant alleges that the Rule 3.850(b)(3) exception to the two-year time limit applies, i.e., that h e retained counsel to file the postconviction motion and counsel through neglect failed to do so, by his own allegations appellant learned that retained counsel had not filed a motion within sufficient time to file a motion of his own, nearly a year before the two-year time limit expired. See Steele v. Kehoe, 747 So. 2d 931, 934 (Fla. 1999) (creating the Rule 3.850(b)(3) exception and recognizing that the attorney s neglect must be the proximate cause of motion s untimeliness).1 Appellant does not allege that retained counsel frustrated his ability to timely file a motion. Cf. Flowers v. State, 889 So.2d 123 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). See also Ward v. Dugger, 508 So. 2d 778, 779 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987) (concluding that prisoner might be entitled to file a belated motion for postconviction relief if the actions of her attorney had frustrated her intention to file such a motion in a timely fashion ). Affirmed. POLEN, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ., concur. Typically, as in Steele, the Rule 3.850(b)(3) exception is applied when retained counsel files the motion outside the two-year time frame. 1 * * * Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Dale C. Cohen, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 04-20572 CF10A, 05-1162 CF10A, 05-1163 CF10A and 05-1164 CF10A. Frank G. Fernandez of Fernandez, Larkin & Garcia, P.A., Tampa, for appellant. No appearance required for appellee. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.