Allen v. State

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT July Term 2009 CHRISTOPHER LEE ALLEN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D04-4972 [July 15, 2009] ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA PER CURIAM. This case is before us on remand from the Supreme Court of Florida for reconsideration following its decision in Yisrael v. State, 993 So. 2d 952 (Fla. 2008). In Yisrael, the supreme court disapproved of our decision as it related to the admission of a release date letter from the Department of Corrections as either a business or public records exception to the hearsay rule. However, the supreme court held that a signed release date-letter, written under seal, or a section 90.902(11) business record certification, may be used to authenticate an attached DOC Crime and Time Report to render the entire report admissible under the public records exception to the hearsay rule. Ingram v. State, 7 So. 3d 657, 657 58 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (citing Yisrael, 993 So. 2d at 960). Here, the State admitted the Crime and Time Report with the required authentication to support a n enhanced sentence under th e Prison Releasee Reoffender statute as approved in Yisrael. We therefore affirm. Affirmed. STEVENSON, MAY and LEVINE, JJ., concur. * * * Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Jorge Labarga, Judge; L.T. Case No. 03-13884CFA02. Carey Haughwout, Public Defender and John M. Conway, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard Valuntas, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.