L.S.F-W. vs Department of Children and Families
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D22-2336 _____________________________ L.S.F-W., Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County. Brantley S. Clark Jr., Judge. September 2, 2022 PER CURIAM. In this case, we ordered Appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed as untimely. Even though Appellant filed the notice of appeal more than thirty days after rendition of the order under review, we do not dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. See generally Fla. R. App. P. 9.146; see also Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(b). Instead, we treat Appellant’s response to the order to show cause as a petition for writ of habeas corpus alleging an entitlement to a belated appeal due to ineffective assistance of counsel in a case involving a termination of parental rights. See Art. V, sec. 2, Fla. Const.; see also Fla. R. App. P. 9.040(c); In Interest of E.H., 609 So. 2d 1289, 1290 (Fla. 1992). Additionally, we transfer the re-designated petition to the lower court for disposition. See Art. V, sec. 2, Fla. Const.; see also Fla. R. App. P. 9.040(b)(1); In Interest of E.H., 609 So. 2d at 1291. KELSEY, JAY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ L.S.F-W., pro se, Appellant. Sarah J. Rumph, Appellate Counsel, Children’s Legal Services, Tallahassee, for Appellee. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
