Antonio D. Holt vs State of Florida

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D22-1971 _____________________________ ANTONIO D. HOLT, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. _____________________________ Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel— Original Jurisdiction. November 23, 2022 PER CURIAM. The Court dismisses the petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel as impermissibly successive. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(d)(6)(C). Petitioner made the same claim in a prior petition, which this Court denied on the merits. The instant petition is repetitious, frivolous, and an abuse of the judicial process. The Court warns Petitioner that any future filings that this Court determines to be frivolous may result in the imposition of sanctions, including a prohibition against any further pro se filings in this Court and a referral to the appropriate institution for disciplinary procedures. See § 944.279, Fla. Stat. (2022). RAY, KELSEY, and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Antonio D. Holt, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.