Willie Field Bryant III vs State of Florida

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D22-455 _____________________________ WILLIE FIELD BRYANT III, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. _____________________________ Petition for Writ of Prohibition—Original Jurisdiction. October 12, 2022 PER CURIAM. Willie Field Bryant moved to dismiss a charge of aggravated battery with a deadly weapon and great bodily harm, claiming he is entitled to self-defense immunity under sections 776.012 and 776.032, Florida Statutes. The trial court denied Bryant’s motion after an evidentiary hearing. Bryant now petitions this Court for a writ of prohibition. The trial court found that the State overcame Bryant’s immunity claim by clear and convincing evidence, and we conclude this finding is supported by competent, substantial evidence. See Morris v. State, 325 So. 3d 1009, 1012 (Fla. 1st DCA 2021); Edwards v. State, 257 So. 3d 586, 587–88 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018); Mederos v. State, 102 So. 3d 7, 11 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012). We also find that the record does not support Bryant’s claim that the trial court improperly shifted the burden of proof onto him at the immunity hearing. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of prohibition. DENIED. MAKAR, JAY, and NORDBY, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Alexis J. Giannasoli, Assistant Public Defender, Gainesville, for Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Robert Charlie Lee, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.