Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc. vs Adamec Cycle Sales Co., Inc. d/b/a Adamec Harley-Davidson of Jacksonville, et al.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D21-3961 _____________________________ HARLEY-DAVIDSON MOTOR COMPANY, INC., Petitioner, v. ADAMEC CYCLE SALES CO., INC. d/b/a ADAMEC HARLEYDAVIDSON OF JACKSONVILLE, et al., Respondents. _____________________________ Petition to Review Non-Final Agency Action—Original Jurisdiction. August 24, 2022 PER CURIAM. The Court dismisses the petition for review of non-final administrative action for lack of jurisdiction. See State v. Planned Parenthood of Sw. & Cent. Fla., Inc., 207 So. 3d 1032, 1034 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (“In deciding whether to grant review of a non-final agency action, showing irreparable injury is a jurisdictional hurdle that we address ‘before determining whether the [ruling] departed from the essential requirements of law.’” (alteration in original) (quoting AVCO Corp. v. Neff, 30 So. 3d 597, 601 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010))). B.L. THOMAS, KELSEY, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Robert H. Hosay, Benjamin J. Grossman and Mallory Neumann of Foley & Lardner, LLP, Tallahassee; Roberta F. Howell and Connor A. Sabatino of Foley & Lardner LLP, Madison, WI, for Petitioner. Andrew G. Thomas and Nicholas A. Bader of Bass Sox Mercer, Tallahassee, for Respondents. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.