INVO, Inc. vs Ring Power Corporation

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D21-2102 _____________________________ INVO, INC., Appellant, v. RING POWER CORPORATION, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County. Monica J. Brasington, Judge. October 12, 2022 PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.”); Thurman v. Davis, 321 So. 3d 341, 344 (Fla. 1st DCA 2021) (“Without a transcript or statement of the evidence, the reviewing court is ‘limited to a consideration of any fundamental error which appears on the face of the order’ and, finding none, must affirm the final judgment.”) (quoting Carney v. Carney, 861 So. 2d 1272, 1273–74 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)). KELSEY, JAY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Michael R. Vater of The Ticktin Law Group, Deerfield Beach, for Appellant. Christen E. Luikart, Catherine M. Licandro, and Jordan Janoski of Murphy & Anderson, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellee. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.