Michael Brad Orso vs State of Florida

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D20-2671 _____________________________ MICHAEL BRAD ORSO, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. _____________________________ Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction. December 16, 2020 PER CURIAM. As there is no motion pending before the lower tribunal, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. This disposition is without prejudice to Petitioner refiling a copy of his motion for postconviction relief in the lower tribunal. See Clark v. State, 954 So. 2d 685 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). LEWIS, ROWE, and BILBREY, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Michael Brad Orso, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.