Damanta Jamar Murphy vs State of Florida

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D20-598 _____________________________ DAMANTA JAMAR MURPHY, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. _____________________________ Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel— Original Jurisdiction. July 21, 2020 PER CURIAM. Petitioner’s motion to accept as timely, docketed February 21, 2020, is denied as moot. The Court notes that the petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel was timely filed as reflected by the institutional filing stamp. The amended petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits. Petitioner’s “motion for show of good cause,” docketed February 21, 2020, and “motion for show of good cause,” docketed March 2, 2020, are denied as moot. LEWIS, ROBERTS, and MAKAR, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Damanta Jamar Murphy, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.