Murphy Arnold Brockington Jr. vs State of Florida
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D19-0052 _____________________________ MURPHY ARNOLD BROCKINGTON JR., Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County. Phillip A. Pena, Judge. August 5, 2019 PER CURIAM In this Anders * appeal, Appellant challenges the trial court’s order revoking his probation. At an evidentiary hearing, the trial court found that Appellant had not violated condition (10) of his probation. However, the written order entered by the trial court revoking Appellant’s probation stated that Appellant had violated condition (10) of his probation. We remand for the trial court to enter a written order that conforms to the trial court’s oral pronouncement. See Leggs v. State, 27 So. 3d 155, 155 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010); Baldwin v. State, 855 So. 2d 1180, 1180 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Burgin v. State, 623 So. 2d 575, 576-77 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). * Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). REVERSED and REMANDED. B.L. THOMAS, MAKAR, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Andy Thomas, Public Defender, Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
