Kandi Crosier vs Clayton L. Crosier

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D18-4711 _____________________________ KANDI CROSIER, Appellant, v. CLAYTON L. CROSIER, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County. James P. Nilon, Judge. December 4, 2019 PER CURIAM. Appellant’s having been given ample time to supplement the record with the hearing transcript, yet having failed to do so, we must affirm the trial court’s order denying her motion to dismiss the Final Judgment of Injunction for Protection Against Domestic Violence with Minor Children. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (noting that a trial court’s decision is presumed correct, an appellant bears the burden of demonstrating error, and the absence of a transcript makes it impossible to show reversible error); see also Halpern v. Koikos, 255 So. 3d 535 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018) (same). AFFIRMED. WOLF, ROBERTS, and JAY, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Kandi Crosier, pro se, Appellant. No appearance for Appellee. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.