Jeffery Wilson vs State of Florida

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D18-4413 _____________________________ JEFFERY WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Marianne L. Aho, Judge. October 23, 2019 PER CURIAM. On appeal, we review the postconviction court’s summarily denied order on the appellant’s motion for postconviction relief. In his motion for postconviction relief, the appellant raised ten grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel. We find no error except with regards to grounds C and J, which are related. Because the record does not refute the appellant’s claim, we must reverse and remand the case back to the postconviction court for it to hold an evidentiary hearing. In grounds C and J, the appellant alleged that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to review his scoresheet with him, and had he have known his lowest permissible sentence based on the scoresheet, he would not have entered an open plea. When no evidentiary hearing is held below, this Court must accept the appellant’s factual allegations as true to the extent they are not refuted by the record. McLin v. State, 827 So. 2d 948, 954 (Fla. 2002). Because the record on appeal does not refute the appellant’s factual allegations on grounds C and J, we must reverse and remand the case back to the postconviction court for it to hold an evidentiary hearing on those grounds. See Fla. R. App. P. 9141(b)(2)(D). We otherwise affirm the postconviction court’s order. AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED with instructions. ROBERTS and ROWE, JJ., concur; KELSEY, J., dissents without opinion. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Jeffery Wilson, pro se, Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Anne C. Conley, Assistant General Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellee. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.